Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45431 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 388 of 2025 Revisionist :- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- Smt. Shashi Rawat And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Anoop Kumar Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. (Order on I.A. No. 02 of 2025 in re: Application Seeking Condonation of Delay) Heard Ms. Sangeeta Verma, learned counsel for revisionist and Shri S.P. Tiwari, learned AGA for the State. By means of the revision, revisionist namely Vinod Kumar as impeached the order dated 13.06.2014 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow (in short "Family Court") in Misc. Criminal Case No. 1226 of 2009 filed by Smt. Shashi Rawat W/o revisionist (opposite party no.1 herein) and Kumari Mehek D/o revisionist (opposite party no.2 herein) impleading revisionist as opposite party. By the order under challenge, the Family Court allowed the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C.. According to the order under challenge dated 13.06.2014, revisionist is under obligation to pay ₹ 3,000/- per month to opposite party no.1 and 1,000 to opposite party ₹ no.2. The operative portion of the order dated 13.06.2014 reads as under :- " ममनन पपरररनन कक ससनप एवव पतपवलन कप अवलककन ककयप। पतपवलन कन अवलककन सन सपष हम कक पकतपकन कक अनसपससरकत कन कपरण 27.11.2013 कक वपद एक पकनय रप सन आजप ककयप गयप, पपरररनन नन सवयव अपनप बयपन पन०डबलल01 कन रप मम पसतसत ककयप हम, कवपकन कक ओर सन बहस कन ददरपन ककई उपससरत नहन रप। पककपरर कन मधय कववपह एक सवनकक त तथय हम, पपरररनन नन अपनन अकभकरनक कक अपनन बयपनर सन समररन कदयप हम, ककसन पकतकल ल सपकय कक अनसपससरकत मम पपरररनन कन अकभकरन एक पकनय रप सन कवशवसननय पतनत हकतन हह तरप ऐसप पतनत हकतप हम कक कववपह कन उपरपवत सवभवतत दहनज कक ममग व मपनरसक, शपरनररक उतपनडन कन कपरण पपरररनन कवपकन कप घर छकडनन कन रलए मजबलर हक गयन सपकय सन यह भन सपष हम कक पपरररनन कन सवयव कन भरणपकषण कन रलए खसद कक ककई कनयकमत आय नहह हम, जबकक पकतपकन कन पपस खनतन हम दसधपर जपनवर हम और सवभवतत वह पपईवनट नदकरन ापएभन करतप हम। मपमलन कन तथयर पररससरकतयर कन पकपश मम यह सपष हम कक जहपह एक ओर पपरररनन अपनप भरण पकषण करनन मम अकम हम वहन पकतपकन पयपरप सपधनवपलप वयकक हम तरप उसनन पपररगण कन भरणपकषण मम जपनबलझकर उपनकप कक हम। तदनससपर पपररनपपत अवशतत एक पकनय रप सन सवनकपर ककयन जपनन यकगय पतनत हकतप हम। आदनश पपररनपपत अनतगरत धपरप 125 द०पककयप सवकहतप सवनकपर ककयप जपतप हम। कवपकन पपररनपपत कक कतरर 19.11.2009 सन पपरररनन सव01 कक तनन हजपर रपयप व पपरररनन सव02 कक एक हजपर रपयन बतदर भरणपकषण अदप करनप ससकनसशशत करन, इस मपमलन मम यकद भरणपकषण कक ककई धनरपकश कवपकन वदपरप अदप कक गयन तक वह पपररगण कन मलल भरणपकषण कक घनरपकश मम समपयकरजत कक जपयनगन। भरण पकषण कक धनरपकश कक अदपयगन कक कतरर पतयनक कलमणडर मपह कक पनदह हकगन ।" The present revision has been filed along with an application seeking condonation of delay of 3263 days and to condone the delay, the reliance has been placed on paragraphs 3 and 4 of the affidavit filed in support of the application seeking condonation of delay. The said paragraphs read as under :- "3. That the deponent being very poor and helpless persons by doing the labour work survive hnis life, but the opp. party No. 1 being very cunning and clever lady always got issue the N.B.W. against the revisionist and the revisionist any how manage the money paid the same then he released on bail. 4. the revisionist has no source of income, so he could not manage the money and could not paid the maintenance, then the opp. party No.1 got issued the N.B.W. on 8.07.2016, then the revisionist sent in jail then any how he has manage Rs. 15000/-and paid to the Opp. party nol.1 then he release on bail on 11.6.2018, there after the opp. party No 1 again got issue the N.B.W on 16.8.2022, there after the revisionist was arrested and again released on bail after paying Rs. 25000/- there after again N.B.W. was issued on 27.4.2023, and he sent in jail on 12.6.2023, there after he paid Rs. 10,000 on 12.6.2023, 15,000/- on 21.6.2023, Rs. 20,000/- on 15.12.2023, Rs. 5000/- on 6.11.2024, and Rs 4000/- on 20.01.2025, and on 17.02.2025 the warrant was issued and the revisionist deposited Rs. 5000/- on 5000/- and 29.03.2025 paid Rs. 20,000/-, and again the order was passed on 27.6.2025 for depositing Rs. 25,000/- with the direction to deposit till 13.08.2025. so under comeplng situation the instant revision is being filed." A bare perusal of the aforesaid paragraph that same is completely vague and accordingly, this Court is of the view that explanation to condone the delay of 3263 days is not sufficient. For the aforesaid reason, this Court is of the view that the application is liable to be rejected and is accordingly rejected. Consequently, the revision is also dismissed. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench