Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45230 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8743 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Patel,Sandeep Sharma Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1, Sri Ankit Singh, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent no. 2 which is taken on record and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.3 and 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2025, neither his retiral dues have been paid nor the respondents have granted the promotion pay scales on completion of 19 years and 24 years of service nor the salary for the period from January to March, 2023 & February to June, 2025 etc. has been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1, Sri Ankit Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.3 and 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.4 then the respondent No.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. It is also provided that in case any dues are found to be payable to the petitioner then the same shall be paid to the petitioner within next four weeks from the representation being decided. While making the payment of admitted dues, the respondents would also consider the payment of interest of the delayed payment of the admitted dues from the date it became till the date of actual payment. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench