- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16298 WP No. 37919 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 37919 OF 2011 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: D N DEVARAJ S/O ANGADI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT DANAVAHALLI NARASAPURA HOBLI KOLAR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT …PETITIONER (SRI D.N.DEVARAJ, PETITIONER –ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT SHAKUNTHALAMA W/O N D S RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS 2. R J LAKSHMI W/O RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 3. RAKESH S/O N D S RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. KUMARI RAMYA D/O N D S RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NARASAPURA VILLAGE Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16298 WP No. 37919 of 2011 KOLAR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 5. UPPALAPATHI VENKATESHWARA RAJU S/O RAGHAVA RAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT N G O COLONY ONGOLE PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH (RESPONDENT Nos.1 TO 5 HAVE BEEN DELETED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 25.09.2012) 6. M PRAKASH S/O LATE B MUNISWAMY SINCE DEAD BY L.Rs., 6 (A). SMT. SWARNALATHA W/O LATE M. PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT No.122, YAMLUR VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE 6 (B). SRI PREETISH S/O LATE M. PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT No.122, YAMLUR VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE 6 (C). SMT. SHILPA D/O LATE M. PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT No.122, YAMLUR VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16298 WP No. 37919 of 2011 7. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD RAJAJINAGAR BRANCH NO. 60/60 DR RAJKUMAR ROAD BANGALORE-10 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER SRI ALEX T PAIKABA …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI H.R. ANANTHAKRISHNAMURTHY FOR R6 (A) TO (C) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT 12.7.2011 PASSED ON IA NO.14 AND 15 IN EX NO.8/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT KOLAR VIDE ANNEXURE-M. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The earlier counsel was permitted to retire from the case vide order dated 08.04.2025. 2. The retirement notice having been served on the petitioner. 3. No arrangements have been made by the petitioner to be represented in the matter. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:16298 WP No. 37919 of 2011 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting matter. 5. Hence, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3