Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15614 (UTT)

ADITYA RAJ CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3528/2025 · 2025-12-23

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11528 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 3 5 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Prateek Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel along with Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Advocate for Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan. 2. Mr. Prateek Tripathi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that water connection has now been granted to the petitioner, therefore, relief claimed do not survive. 3. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan also makes similar statement and he produced in Court the letter received by him from Executive Engineer, Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan dated 22.10.2025, which is taken on record. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.12.2025 Mahinder/ 2025:UHC:11528