SURENDRA KUMAR S/O RAMCHANDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5140/2025 · 2025-06-20
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15612 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15612 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23371] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5140/2025
1. Surendra Kumar S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Jakhrana, Police Station Behror, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar).
2. Omprakash S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Jakhrana, Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar).
3. Billuram S/o Matadeen, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Jakhrana, Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhash Sharma For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. S.S. Ola Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)
Order 20/06/2025
1. The accused-petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.521/2020 registered with the Police Station Behror, District Bhiwadi for offence under Sections 143, 323 & 341 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel further submits that in the First Information Report, no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused-
[2025:RJ-JP:23371] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5140/2025] petitioners, however, in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., it has been alleged that the accused-petitioners caused injuries to the complainant party by a wooden stick. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody for last more than three months and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused- petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the submissions made by
learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and submits that one of the injured- Rama Devi received grievous injuries by a sharp weapon.
4. Considered the submissions made at bar, so also perused the challan papers
5. Having regard to the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused-petitioners in the First Information Report and in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.; so also the fact that the allegation as has been levelled against them is of causing injuries by a wooden stick; they are in custody for last more than three months and the Police after completion of investigation has submitted the charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of
[2025:RJ-JP:23371] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5140/2025] them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /3