Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156016 (ALL)

DR. KIRAN KUMARI DAS v. SRI RANJAN KUMAR, PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL HEALTH (AYUSH-2) LKO.

CAPL/2476/2025 · 2025-09-22

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2476 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Vimal Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite party. 2. Objections filed to the compliance affidavit on behalf of the applicant are taken on record. 3. It transpires form the record of this case that the Writ Court passed an interim order on 24.04.2025 in Writ-A No. 4122 of 2025 whereby, the order placing the services of the petitioner under suspension dated 23.10.2024 had been stayed. 4. As per the compliance affidavit filed by the opposite party, the interim order dated 24.04.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 4122 of 2025 has been complied with and the petitioner has been reinstated on his post vide order dated 03.09.2025. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that order passed by the Writ Court has not been complied with as the applicant had been reinstated in service after about four months from the date of passing of the interim order, without providing benefit of salary of the said four months. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and I find that this Court vide interim order dated 24.04.2025 had stayed the order of suspension dated 23.10.2024 and in compliance of the said order, the applicant had already been reinstated in service. So far Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vimal Kumar, Km. Vishwa Mohini Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dr. Kiran Kumari Das .....Applicant(s) Sri Ranjan Kumar, Prin. Secy. Medical Health (Ayush-2) Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) as, the issue of payment of salary for the period from the date of passing of interim order by this Court till the date of reinstatement of the applicant in service, is concerned, since the writ petition is still pending and has not been decided, the applicant can raise the said issue of payment of salary in the pending writ petition. 7. So far as, the contempt application is concerned, since the interim order dated 24.04.2025 had been complied with, this Court is of the view that nothing remains to be adjudicated in this contempt application. 8. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. September 22, 2025 Anurag CAPL No. 2476 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench