Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155975 (ALL)

PAWAN KUMAR v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (JUDICIAL), TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND 6 OTHERS

/4700/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45518 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4700 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Surya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya to decide Case No. T202204230303293 - Pawan Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and Another, U/S 31/32 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Case No. T202204230303293 - Pawan Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and Another, U/S 31/32 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench