Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155970 (ALL)

SMT. KHUSHBOO JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/7537/2025 · 2025-08-11

Manish Kumar, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46776-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7537 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Khushboo Jaiswal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad Mishra,Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Prakash Dubey Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers: "(i) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the rejection order dated 11.12.2019 issued by Opposite Party No. 3, and a writ of mandamus directing Opposite Party No. 2, the District Magistrate, Ayodhya, and Opposite Party No. 3, The New India Assurance Company Limited, to reconsider and expeditiously disburse the petitioner's insurance claim of Rs. 5,00,000/- under the "Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana" within a stipulated time frame, as granted by this Hon'ble Court." We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Kartikey Dubey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Bhanu Prakash Dubey, learned counsel for Respondent No.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset says the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh. Order Date :- 11.8.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench