Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155963 (ALL)

PAWAN KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

A482/6439/2025 · 2025-08-07

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46181 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6439 of 2025 Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the summoning order dated: 04.04.2023 passed by "Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratham, Faizabad", vide Case Crime No. 312/2022 "State Versus Pawan Kumar Pandey" under section 283, 431, I.P.C. and section 3 Prevention of damage to public property act, Police Station- Purakalandar, District- Faizabad, and further proceedings of the case in pursuance thereof, pending in the "Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratham, Faizabad",in the ends of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench