Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15596 (AP)

TAMARAPU KRISHNAMACHARI v. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS

WP/9996/2025 · 2025-04-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010199932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 9996/2025 Between: Tamarapu Krishnamachari ...PETITIONER AND Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri V.Vinod K Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.Sumanth, learned standing counsel for TTD for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not permitting the petitioner and his family members to perform the daily rituals like Nitya Deepa, Dhoopa Naivedyams to the Acharya Purusha, namely Sri Vedanta Desikar in the Temple located outside the Prakaram of Sri Govindaraja Swamy Temple, Tirupati, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his arguments and urged to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 13.12.2024 made by the petitioner. 2 4. Learned standing counsel would submit that the 1st respondent will consider the representation made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side directing the learned 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 13.12.2024 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders strictly as per the law in vogue, preferably within six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 21.04.2025 KA 3 96 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 9996/2025 Date: 21.04.2025 KA