Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15595 (KAR)

SMT. GOPAMMA v. SRI. NAGESH

WP/3123/2025 · 2025-02-17

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7085 WP No. 3123 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3123 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GOPAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS SMT RATHNAMMA D/O LATE SRINIVAS AND GOPAMMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 2. SRI RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE SRINIVAS AND GOPAMMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 3. SMT NARAYANAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S, SMT SAMPANGEMMA D/O GURUVAPPA AND LATE NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.12 HARIJANA COLONY DEVANAHALLI TOWN AND TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560093. 4. SRI LAKSHMANA S/O GURUVAPPA AND LATE NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.4355, 9TH WARD Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7085 WP No. 3123 of 2025 BEHIND ADHI SHAKTI TEMPLE SHETTIHALLI, RAMANAGARA-560091. 5. SMT YASHODHA D/O GURUVAPPA AND LATE NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.12 HARIJANA COLONY DEVANAHALLI TOWN AND TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560093. 6. SMT LAKSHMAMMA D/O VELURAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT DANAGANAPALLI VILLAGE DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560093. 7. SMT RATHANAMMA D/O VELURAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT DODDAJALA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560093. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNIL S RAO, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.T SESHAGIRI RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NAGESH S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT DODDAJALA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE-560091. 2. SMT RATHNAMMA D/O KRISHNAPPA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7085 WP No. 3123 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT DODDAJALA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE-560092. 3. SRI A. RAMAKRISHNA S/O ANJANEYACHAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.3, OPP. TO SRIRAMA TEMPLE BYATARAYANAPURA BANGALORE-BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE-560092 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER (ANNEXURE-A) DATED: 13.08.2024 PASSED IN MISC. PET.57/2016 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 17.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Trial Court by filing a review. He submits that the petitioners - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:7085 WP No. 3123 of 2025 shall be permitted to claim the benefit of exclusion of time spent before this Court in pursuing this writ petition available under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty sought for, if law permits. The petitioners are entitled to claim the benefit available under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42