APHC010197572019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8632/2019 Between: 1. TALLURU KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHI,, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.6- 27/41, BYPASS ROAD, WARD NO.33, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUQA POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. GUNDAVARAPU SRINIVASULU, S/O. VENKATA NARAYANA, VASAVI RESIDENCY, PANDARIPURAM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. PATTELA RAMAKOTESHWARA RAE, S/O. VEERASWAMI, D.NO. 20-1-49, LAMBADI VEEDI MANGALAPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. KONJETI MALA KONDAIAH, S/O. SUBBAIAH, VENNERU VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. . 7. SHAIK FATHIMABI, W/O. ANWAR BASHA, MAHINDRA NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 8. SHAIK AJEES SAHEB, S/O. KODAN SAHEB, KARVADHI VILLAGE, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ..RESPONDENTS 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8632 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the respondent No.1 in registering the FIR in pursuant to the complaint dated 20.5.2019 made by the petitioner even in spite of the contents of the complaint clearly disclose the commission of the cognizable offences by the respondents 4 to 8 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to section 154 Cr.P.C. and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to register the FIR based on the complaint dated 20.5.2019 made by the petitioner against the respondents 4 to 8 for committing the offences of fabrication of fake documents, impersonation, criminal intimidation and attempted to grab the land …” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 20.08.2025 PSK 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 65 WRIT PETITION No:8632 OF 2019 Date: 20.08.2025 W PSK