Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155949 (ALL)

RAM JANAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. ENERGY DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/8804/2025 · 2025-08-12

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47022 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8804 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Janam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Energy Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishant Kumar Shukla,Awnish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for petitioner, State Counsel for opposite party no.1 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 to 5. 2. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no.6 hence dispensed with. 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to continue petitioner in services and for recording his attendance in terms of the new bio-metric attendance system. 4. It is submitted that petitioner although being an employee of the M/s Broadcast Engineering Consultant India Ltd, Noiada through its Managing Director has been employed in the department on outsourcing basis but the contract of out sourcing being still in existence, petitioner has been illegally restrained from work. 5. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before party no.4 i.e. Executive Engineer, 33/11 KV Sub- Station, T.P. Nagar, Sultanpur which shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench