C/M CHANDIKA SHIKSHA ASHRAM THRU. PRESIDENT NAMELY ARUN KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/7571/2025 · 2025-08-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47271 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7571 of 2025 Petitioner :- C/M Chandika Shiksha Ashram Thru. President Namely Arun Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Secondary Education U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manjeet Singh,Amrendra Bakhsha Das Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Shachindra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri S. P. Singh who appears for the respondent no.2.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction from this Court for decision on the representation filed by the petitioner contained in Annexure no.1 dated 20/21.01.2025.
3. The genesis of the dispute was recorded by this court in the
judgment dated 29.09.2022 passed in Writ-C No.1006333 of 2010 whereby the matter was remanded. It is stated that in terms of the said remand, a fresh order came to be passed in the year 2023, which is subject matter of challenge before this court in Writ-C No.893 of 2023.
4. Considering the fact that issues as raised are subject matter of dispute before this court, the filing of the representation, cannot be considered till the dispute is adjudicated by this court. Considering the said, no directions, as sought, can be issued.
5. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
6. The petitioner would be entitled to agitate his rights after the decision is rendered in the pending writ petition.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench