APHC010198842009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Between: Smt.P.Geetha, W/o.Sridhar Reddy AND P.Sridhar Reddy, S/o.Sri Manohar Reddy Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following Mr.K.V.N.Chiranjeevi, counsel for the appellant could not secure any instructions from the appellant. 2. Recording the said submission dismissed for non-prosecution petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. July 30, 2025 vasu IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.557 of 2009 Smt.P.Geetha, W/o.Sridhar Reddy … Petitioner P.Sridhar Reddy, S/o.Sri Manohar Reddy … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Respondent : Mr.M.V.S.Suresh Kumar The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J) Mr.K.V.N.Chiranjeevi, learned counsel representing the learned appellant submits that in spite of their best efforts, they could not secure any instructions from the appellant. Recording the said submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous ding, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J _____________________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J [3526] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Petitioner Respondent Sai Gangadhar Chamarty representing the learned submits that in spite of their best efforts, they Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is No order as to costs. Miscellaneous ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J _____________________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J