Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15592 (GAU)

SMTI. RUPALEE BORAH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 11 ORS

WP(C)/4101/2023 · 2025-07-29

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010149312023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4101/2023 SMTI. RUPALEE BORAH W/O SRI JITUL BORDOLOI, R/O DERGAON TOWN, WARD NO. 7, P.O.- DERGAON, GOLAGHAT, PIN-785614 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 11 ORS REPRESENTED THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2:THE COLLECTOR CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISRICT-GOLAGHAT ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY(LA) DISTRICT-GOLAGHAT ASSAM 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER. DERGAON REVENUE CIRCLE DERGAON MOUZA DIST-GOLAGHAT 5:NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORP. LIMITED 3RD FLOOR PTI BUILDING 4-PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI 6:THE GENERAL MANAGER (PROJECT) NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORP. LIMITED Page No.# 2/3 OPPOSITE BRAHMAPUTRA ACADEMY JUNIOR COLLEGE PIN-785001 DIST-JORHAT 7:NAREN SARMA PHUKAN S/O LATE BHOLANATH PHUKAN R/O DERGAON TOWN P.O.-DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT PIN-785614 8:NILA PADMA SARMA PHUKAN S/O LATE ANANDI PHUKAN R/O DERGAON TOWN P.O.-DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT PIN-785614 9:ANIL SARMA PHUKAN S/O LATE ANANDI PHUKAN R/O DERGAON TOWN P.O.-DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT PIN-785614 10:PRAFULLA SARMA PHUKAN S/O LATE PURNA KANTA SARMA PHUKAN R/O DERGAON TOWN P.O.-DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT PIN-785614 11:PABAN SARMA PHUKAN S/O LATE PURNA KANTA SARMA PHUKAN R/O DERGAON TOWN P.O.-DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT PIN-785614 12:BIJIT SARMA PHUKAN S/O LATE PURNA KANTA SARMA PHUKAN R/O DERGAON TOWN P.O.-DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT PIN-78561 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K NATH, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 30.07.2025 Mr. D.K. Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner desires not to press the matter any further and accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant