IN T 133 Nirbhai Sin The Land A District Ba CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU learned Civ Application 01.2.2024 ( judgment an plaintiff/pet consequenti property, de note at page was proceed and decree the petition despite pass not comply CR-429-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision No Date of decision : ai Singh Versus and Acquisition Collector-cum-Sub D ict Barnala AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for issu d Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Barnala to cation dated 23.1.2024 bearing No.Ex 024 (Annexure P-2) moved by the ent and decree dated 24.8.2023 (Annexu Learned counsel for the pe iff/petitioner had filed the suit for quential relief of permanent injunctio rty, detailed in the head note of the suit t page 14 of the paper book. Due to no roceeded ex-parte; and the learned trial ecree dated 24.8.2023 (Annexure P-1) etitioner along with interest amount. L te passing of decree, the respondent/defe mply with the same. As such, the petitio 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH on No.429 of 2025 sion :-23.01.2025 …..Petitioner Sub Divisional Magistrate Tapa, …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA or issuing necessary direction to the ala to dispose of the Execution No.Exe.22 of 2024, registered on the petitioner for execution of nnexure P-), expeditiously. he petitioner submits that the t for mandatory injunction with junction with regard to the suit e suit and also detailed in the head to non-appearance, the respondent trial Court vide ex-parte judgment 1) decreed the suit in favour of nt. Learned counsel submits that nt/defendant/Judgement Debtor did petitioner was constrained to move VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.27 10.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the Execut counsel sub being denie adjourned counsel sub direction is Barnala, to (Annexure P behalf of re prayer made into the me direction to decide the E within a per this order. January 23 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep CR-429-2025 xecution Application dated 23.1.2024 el submits that the petitioner/Decree H denied the fruits of the decree as, the rned as many as 14 times and is still pen submits that at this stage the peti ion is issued to the learned Executing C , to consider and take a final decision exure P-2) in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AA f of respondent-State and submits that he r made by learned counsel for the petition After hearing learned counsel f the merits of the present petition, the ion to learned Executing Court/Civil J e the Execution Application (Annexure P n a period of six months from the date o Pending application(s), if any, sh 3, 2025 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 .1.2024 (Annexure P-2). Learned cree Holder is an old man who is s, the Execution Petition has been till pending for 31.1.2025. Learned e petitioner would be satisfied if uting Court/Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) cision on the Execution Application i, AAG Punjab accepts notice on that he has no objection in case the petitioner is accepted at this stage nsel for the parties, without going , the same is disposed of with a ivil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Barnala, to exure P-2), in accordance with law, date of receipt of certified copy of any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.27 10.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document