Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15590 (AP)

Chamalamudi Chanti Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/4343/2025 · 2025-06-26

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

lN THE HIGH COURTOF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA FRIDAY. THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE at •ia¢ :PRESENT: TfiE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY • it] fflE CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4343 OF 2025 EE= I. `` l`ies¥. Sxtb`RE_S } +a?'``` Betwee n : Chamalamudi Chanti Babu, S/o Yakobu, Aged 38 years, Occ-Cultivation, R/o. Lingarao Gudem Village, Sriparru Panchayat, Eluru Mandal and Districti Erstwhjle West Godavari District. / ...Petitioner/Accuseci AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent 2. Kilari Lavanya, W/o. Subramanyam, aged 37 years, R/o. Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ...Respondent/ Defacto Complainant (R2 is impleaded as per the court order dated 29.05.2025 in I.A.No.01 of 2025 in Crl.P.No.4343 of 2025) petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstanceS§ stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to him by directingl the police to release him on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with crime No. 70 of 2025 of EIuru Rural Police Station, EIuru,-~Brszt~rict in th6'j fr interests of justice, # The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the I. memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the'' arguments of SRI PETLURI NAGA RAJU, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following APHCO10200322025 EHE] EEflEEEi IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AIVIARAVATl (Special original Jurl-sdjctjon) [3327] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4343/2025 Betwee n : Chamalamudi chanti Babu, m.PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND state ofAndhra Pradesh & I..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others Counsel for the petitioner/accused: 1. PETLURI NAGA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. NAGESWARA RAO CHAVA IbeJCour[ Made the Fo[]owinq ortry The Criminal Petition, under section 482 of the BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioner herein to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.70 of 2025 of EIuru Rural Police Station, registered for the offence punishable under Section 69 of the BNS. \--_* ^`.I ` i-r3 .'{'_ \T 2 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.02.2O25, the defacto complainant filed a report before the police stating that she is a resident of Kukatpalli, Hyderabad and she got acquaintance with the accused who is a resident of Gudivaka Lanka Village of Eluru Mandal and subsequently, the accused proposed her and the defacto complainant believed him as the accused would take good care of her with love, and the accused engaged in sexual intercourse with her on multiple occasions at different places under the guise of marriage. Thereafter, the accused refused to marry her. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petit-loner submits that earlier a report has been lodged by the defacto complainant as against the petitioner herein in Crime No.231 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 74 and 115(2) read with 3(5) of the BNS. Thereafter, the present complaint has been filed as against the petitioner by giving d'lfferent version. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that t:he petitioner herein promised the defacto complainant to marry her and under the said pretext he had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant. ` ---\<j_~ _ -T€---§ 6. A perusal of the earlier complaint fI'led by the defacto complainant goes to show that the petitioner marrl-ed her and thereafter, they lived together in different places. Thereafter, after lapse of one year, the present complaint has been filed agaI'nSt the petitioner herein aI[egjng that the petitioner herein had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant under the guise that he would marry her, by gl-ving totally a different vers]-on to the earlier complaint which I-S filed against the petitioner. 7| In view of the aforesaI[d facts and circumstances of the case, this court js jncljned to consider request of petitI-Oner for grant of anticl-patory bail. 8[ AccordI-ngly, I-n the event of his arrest I-n the above crime, the petitioner herein shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condI-lion that the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when requI-red and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or promI-Se tO the prosecution witnesses. REii- The petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00 A.M. and 01.00 P.M., till filing of charge sheet. 9| Accorqing[y, the Criminal Pet-It|lOn iS allowed. i J1 . sD/-K. KASIRAO AC,HARl I //TRUE COPY// ' ASSISTAN REGISTRAR OFFICER 1. The Station House Officer, EIuru Rural Police Station, EIuru District 2. Kilari Lavanya, W/a. Sl'lbramanyam, aged 37 years, R/o. Kukatpally'-, Hyderabad, Telangana State. (by RPAD) 3. One CC to SRl. PETLURI NAGA RAJU Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5| One spare copy :PSR HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED : 27/06/2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.4343 of 2025 ALLOWED . i