MANJULA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM PUSTAHAR VIBHAG LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIA/8923/2025 · 2025-08-08
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155891 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155891 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46315 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8923 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manjula Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pustahar Vibhag Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shankar Tiwari,Aditya Pandey,Manju Sonkar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.1 to 7.
2. In view of order being proposed to be passed, notices to opposite party no.8, stand dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed challenging appointment letter dated 28.05.2025 whereby opposite party no.8 has been appointed on the post of Anganbadi Worker in the Centre concerned.
4. It has been submitted that opposite party no.8 has been appointed on the basis of incorrect income certificate but admits that the said certificate has not yet been cancelled although petitioner has already submitted that a representation with regard to income certificate of opposite party no.8.
5. Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 01.08.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and as per which representation made by petitioner against Income Certificate of opposite party no.8 has already been considered and decided rejecting petitioner's representation since the income certificate of opposite party no.8 i.e. Pooja wife of Saket has been found to be correct as per inquiry report dated 23.04.2025. The instructions also indicate that opposite party no.8 had obtained merit marks of 9.57 under the below poverty line category whereas petitioner obtained 7.12 marks in the above poverty line category.
6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any occasion to entertain the petition, which is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage itself. Parties to bear their own costs. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 Subodh/- Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench