APHC010199322018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 8669/2018 Between: S.K.A. Basha, ...PETITIONER AND The A P S R T C State Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY 2. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) 3. VENKAT REDDY THIPPARTHI(SC FOR EPFO) The Court made the following: 2 HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 8669 of 2018 ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying Higher Pension Rs 4 534/ to the Petitioner consequent to deduction of 10 percent contribution from the Petitioners salary towards Employees Pension Scheme 1995 as same is illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to pay higher pension Rs 4 534/ in view of the Petitioners Higher Pension option and on deduction of 10 percent contribution from his salary towards Employees Pension Scheme 1995.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent-APSRTC is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 19.06.2025 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 8669 of 2018 19.06.2025 Mjl /*