OM PRAKASH PATHAK v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TAHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/4725/2025 · 2025-08-07
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155866 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155866 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46109 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4725 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Pathak Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uzma Anjum,Pramod Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the respondent No. 1 to decide the Regular Suit No. 3008/2024, suit for partition and permanent injunction (Om Prakash Pathak Vs. Ram Karan and others) and also prayed for for a direction to respondent No. 1 to pass interim order for maintaining status quo in the aforesaid proceedings expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the application for interim relief pending in Regular Suit No. 3008/2024, suit for partition and permanent injunction (Om Prakash Pathak Vs. Ram Karan and others) in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow to consider and decide application for interim relief pending Regular Suit No. 3008/2024, suit for partition and permanent injunction (Om Prakash Pathak Vs. Ram Karan and others) within a period of six weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents in case there is no legal impediment. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 7.8.202/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench