VIRMA DEVI DHANGAR v. U.O.I. THRU. INTEGRATED HQ OF MOD (ARMY) NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
/8636/2025 · 2025-08-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155835 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155835 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44948 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8636 of 2025 Petitioner :- Virma Devi Dhangar Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Integrated Hq Of Mod (Army) New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vipul Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner is granted liberty to correct the nomenclature of opposite party no.1 during the course of day. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Sri S.B.Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 and 2 and learned State counsel for opposite party no.3. 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to correct entries in service records of petitioner's husband, late Roshan Singh Dhangar by correcting petitioner's name since it is permissible in terms of letter issued by Integrated Headquarters of Ministry of Defence (Army) dated
20.04.2023. Further prayer for release of withheld family pension along with interest has also been sought. 4. It has been submitted that petitioner has legally changed her name from Virma Devi alias Brama Kumari to Virma Devi Dhangar which was notified in Gazette of India on 20.01.2024, a copy of which is annexed as annexure no.2. It is however submitted that despite the aforesaid aspect being brought to the notice of opposite parties, petitioner has been directed to furnish fresh documents vide letter dated 25.03.2025. 5. On the basis of instructions received, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to submit aforesaid documents except for indicating an advertisement in two national daily since her name has already been indicated as changed in Gazette in India. 6. Learned counsel for opposite parties do not have any objection in case the concerned authority is directed to take a final decision. 7. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, since opposite
parties are aware of grievance of petitioner as it is evident from the letter dated 25.03.2025, liberty is granted to petitioner to submit the documents required by the authorities by the said letter. However, the authority shall not insist on publication in two national daily since petitioner's change of name has already been indicated in the Gazette of India, copy of which shall be submitted before the authorities concerned.
Final decision with regard to same including payment of arrears shall be taken by the authorities concerned within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 8. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench