SMT. SUMAN SAHU v. ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE COURT NUMBER 10, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A227/4109/2024 · 2025-07-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40062 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4109 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Suman Sahu Respondent :- Addl. District And Session Judge Court Number 10, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Chandra Jain,Dhruv Pratap Singh,Piyush Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- Salma Bano,Shresth Agarwal Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shresth Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging an order dated 11.7.2024, whereby the revisional court had passed an order remanding the matter to the S.C.C. Court for decision afresh, limited to the questions with regard to the quantum of rent.
3. Considering the fact that the evidence is to be re-appreciated, I do not see any reason to interfere. However, as the original suit was instituted in the year 2010, the S.C.C. Court is directed to decide the suit in terms of the remand order dated 11.07.2024 positively, within a period of four months from today.
4. It is further directed that if any of the parties seek adjournment, the same shall be granted on a cost of Rs. 5,000/- per adjournment.
5. A report shall be sent by the S.C.C. Court to this Court after four months with regard to the compliance of the directions issued.
6. It is further stated that while doing so, the S.C.C. Court would be entitled to see the conduct of the opposite parties in any other default that the opposite parties may have committed in depositing the rent.
7. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench