Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15580 (CHH)

PARAS GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2214/2021 · 2025-03-22

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:13915 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2214 of 2021 1. Paras Gupta S/o Shri Narendra Gupta Aged About 22 Years Presently Studying In M. B. B. S. Final Year (Part-I), Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Medical College, Dimrapal, Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh 2. Students Of Batch Of 2017 (Mbbs Final Year Part-I) In Chhattisgarh Through Their Authorized Representative Namely Paras Gupta, S/o Shri Narendra Gupta, Aged About 22 About Years Presently Studying In M. B. B. S. Final Year (Part-I), Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Medical College, Dimrapal, Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 2. Director Medical Education The Directorate Of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, Dks Bhavan Campus, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences And Ayush University Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Registrar, Sector-40, Uparwara, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 493661 4. National Medical Commission Through Its Secretary, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-1, New Delhi 110077 ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms. Yamini Kaser, Advocate holding the brief of HAPS Bhatia, Advocate For State : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Addl. Advocate General For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22. 03.2025 SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.22 16:55:01 +0530 2 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by Ms. Kaser, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant