Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15580 (ALL)

M/S D.K. ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/9280/2021 · 2025-08-19

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143474-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9280 of 2021 Petitioner :- M/S D.K. Enterprises Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Prasad Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Kumar Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Kailash Prasad Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed for the following reliefs : (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to release the payment of the petitioner of Rs.10,64,460/- in pursuance of work orders completed by the petitioner's firm as per agreement allotted to him. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2020. (iii) Issue any other suitable order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) Award the cost of the writ petition to the petitioner. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was allotted work order by the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mathura and the bills amounting to Rs.10,64,460/- was approved by the Nagar Palika but the payment has not been made to the petitioner till date despite repeated representations of the petitioner. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission, without going into the controversy, the present writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation raising all its grievances before the respondent no. 3, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Kosikalan, District- Mathura, within a period of one month from today. 5. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by a speaking and reasoned order, after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties within a period of one month from the date it receives the representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 KS (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- KISHAN SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad