SRI S N GOPAL KRISHNA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
RP/52/2025 · 2025-04-28
Ashok S Kinagi
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15577 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15577 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18162 RP No. 52 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REVIEW PETITION NO. 52 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
SRI S N GOPAL KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O B NARAYANAPPA
2.
SRI. SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O B NARAYANAPPA
3.
SRI. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O B NARAYANAPPA
ALL ARE R/AT SHIVAKOTE VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK (PRESENTLY YELAHANAKA TALUK) BANGALORE- 560089 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRAPPA V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001
2.
THE DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL AND HUSBANDRY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18162 RP No. 52 of 2025
VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
3.
SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O LATE BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS,
SRI. B NARAYANAPPA DECEASED BY HIS LRS
4. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE B NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
RESPONDENT Nos.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT SHIVAKOTE VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK (PRESENTLY YELHANKA TALUK) BANGALORE -560 089 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.R. RAJENDRA, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 20.11.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN RSA NO.1893/2021 AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18162 RP No. 52 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the review petition.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the review petition, I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for consideration and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS