Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:15298
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 2546 of 2025 • Makardhwaj Manjhi S/o Parmanand Manji Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Darlipara, Police Station- Devbhog, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh
... Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Devbhog, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh
... Non-applicant For Applicant : Ms. Rekha Shrivastava, Advocate For Non- applicant/State : Ms. Subha Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 01/04/2025
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 39/2025 registered at Police Station Devbhog, District Gariyaband (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the Police of Police Station, Devbhog, District Gariyaband (C.G.) has received a secret information by the informant and conduct a raid and seized 42.220 bulk liters illicit liquor from the illegal possession of the applicant and thereafter, the Police has registered a case for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act against the applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. She further submits that the under Section 34(2) of the Chattisgarh Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years and the applicant is in jail since 04.02.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for releasing the applicant on regular bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. She further submits that the applicant is having 03 criminal antecedent under the Excise Act and he is a habitual offender. As such, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6.
Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has not been filed before the competent Court and the present applicant has 03 criminal antecedent under the Excise Act and he is a habitual offender, further he has misused the bail granted to him earlier,
3 and that the quantity of liquor seized is 42.220 bulk liters liquor and also in light of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another, reported in (2022) 8 SCC 559, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court had cancelled the bail granted to the accused therein on the ground that the accused had previous antecedents, this Court is of the opinion that is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant- Makardhwaj Manjhi filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., involved in Crime No. 39/2025 registered at Police Station Devbhog, District Gariyaband (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, is rejected. 7. Needless to say that the trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice vaishali VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.04.02 11:42:57 +0530