KHUSHNUMA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS SEVA AVAM PUSTAHAR DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/8668/2025 · 2025-09-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8668 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. (C.M. Application No. 2 of 2025)
1. This application has been filed seeking withdrawal of writ petition.
2. The reasons assigned in affidavit filed in support of application are sufficient.
3. Accordingly, the application for withdrawal of writ petition is allowed. Order on Writ Petition
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner states that he does not want to press this writ petition and same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Manish Mathur,J.) September 2, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Khushnuma Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Seva Avam Pustahar Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench