MOHAMMAD KALAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LKO AND ORS.
/7445/2025 · 2025-08-04
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155705 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155705 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45147-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7445 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Kalam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Infrastructure And Industrial Development Lko And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sharad Tewari Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"a). To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opp-party no.2 to decide the representation dated 02.07.2025 submitted in the office of Opp-party no.2 with regard to illegal interference by officers of Uttar Pradesh Expressways Industrial Development Department (hereinafter referred as UPEIDA) on petitioner's land i.e., Gata no. 432 KHA, area 0.1080 hectare situated in village Horilpur, Tehsil and Pargana Akbarpur District- Ambedkar Nagar as per the law."
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is running a sawmill on Gata No. 432Kha area 0.1080 Hectare situated in Village Horilpur, Tehsil and Pargana- Akbarpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, but his business is being constantly affected by the Officers of the respondents no.2 and 3, who have orally told the petitioner that the UPEIDA is planning to build commercial corridor which is proposed to pass through the petitioner's land. The petitioner has submitted a representation to the CEO of the UPEIDA on
02.07.2025, which has not been decided till date. Hence this writ petition has been filed.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Darpan Sharma Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench