Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010147982021
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4893/2021 DEVNARAYAN GUPTA S/O LATE CHULARI GUPTA, R/O OLD A.T. ROAD, WARD NO. 10, DOOMDOOMA, P.S. DOOMDOOMA, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT .OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT.
RELIEF AND REHABILITATION BRANCH DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA
Page No.# 2/4 TINSUKIA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 786125 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DOOMDOOMA REVENUE CIRCLE DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 78618 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M KHAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE,SC, FINANCE Linked Case : WP(C)/4882/2021 DIBYAWATI BORUAH W/O- UMESH BORUAH VILL- ULUP P.O. ULUP P.S. MARGHERITA DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY-6 2:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT.
RELIEF AND REHABILITATION BRANCH DISPUR GHY-06 3:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPTT. DISPUR
Page No.# 3/4 GHY-06 4:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06 5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER TINISUKIA TINSUKIA DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN- 786125 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER MARGHERITA REVENUE CIRCLE MARGHERITA DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN- 786181 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A M KHAN Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 30.01.2025
Mr. A. M. Khan, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the petitioner has been granted the enhanced ex gratia amount during the pendency of the present proceedings and accordingly, he submits that he would like to withdraw the present writ petition. The said submission is not objected to by Ms. U. Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate and Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel Revenue Department. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawl.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant