Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15569 (CAL)

SAGNIK GHOSHAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/976/2025 · 2025-03-21

Debangsu Basak, Smita Das De

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21.03.2025 Item No.13 Ct. No. 26 CHC Allowed C.R.M.(A) 976 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Jadavpur Police Station Case No. 42 of 2025 dated 01.03.2025 under Sections 329(4)/324(2)/109/326(g)/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 3/ 4 of PDPP Act, 1984 and Section 9 of West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1972, pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, at South 24 Parganas. And In the matter of : Sagnik Ghoshal ...… petitioner Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Senior Advocate Mr. Achin Jana, Advocate Mr. Debarshi Brahma, Advocate Mr. Suman Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh, Advocate .…for the petitioner Mr. Suman De, Sr. Govt. Advocate Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha, Advocate .…for the State 1. Report submitted in Court be taken on record. 2. Petitioner before us is a student of Jadavpur University. On the same day three police complaints were lodged against the petitioner. 3. We enquired from the State as to whether there was any criminal antecedent so far as the petitioner is concerned or not. 4. In response thereto, learned advocate appearing for the State submits that, there is no criminal antecedents so far as the petitioner is concerned. 2 5. Incident is one of assault. Nature of injury does not suggest that, any of the injured suffered grievous hurt. 6. Considering the fact noted above, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 8. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)