Kommuri Hari Hara Krishna Prasad, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10023/2024 · 2025-08-11
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15569 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15569 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010199122024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10023/2024 Between:
1. KOMMURI HARI HARA KRISHNA PRASAD,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO (LATE), AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-3-245, DWARAKAMAI BUILDING, GUPTA CENTER, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH-520012.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHAVANIPURAM PS, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KRISHNA LANKA P.S., VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IBRAHIMPATNAM P.S.
IBRAHIMPATNAM, NTR DISTRICT.
6. NANDRU RAVI KUMAR, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, OCC DRIVER, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.6-101, KETHANAKONDA, NTR DISTRICT-521456.
7. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY
2
LIMITED, D. NO 59-14-2A, SANTHI PLAZA, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, GAYATRI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520008.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned high-handed action of the respondents herein more particularly Respondent Nos.3 to 4 in not taking action with respect to the petitioner s complaint dated 04.03.2024 against Respondent No.6 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and violative of Principles of Natural justice and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and against the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequentially direct the official respondents herein to take action with respect to the petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2024 against Respondent No.6 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents herein to take action with respect to the petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2024 against Respondent No.6 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SK MEHABOOB NADEEM FAYAZ Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10023 of 2024
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned high- handed action of the respondents herein more particularly Respondent Nos.3 to 4 in not taking action with respect to the petitioner’s complaint dated 04.03.2024 against Respondent No.6 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and violative of Principles of Natural justice and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and against the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequentially direct the official respondents herein to take action with respect to the petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2024 against Respondent No.6 and pass…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions would submit that no crime has been registered against the respondent No.6 since the subject matter in the present petition is purely civil in nature.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.
4
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 12.08.2025. UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.10023 of 2024
Dated.12.08.2025
UPS
143