Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15568 (AP)

Mr.Garlapati Giridhar S/o Krishna Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/18721/2016 · 2025-06-19

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010199492016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18721/2016 Between: Mr.garlapati Giridhar S/o Krishna Rao, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in not issuing hall-ticket to the petitioner for the written examination scheduled on 15.06.2016 for appointment 2 to the post of “Paricharika” pursuant to the advertisement issued by the 3rd respondent published on 14.04.2016 in Eenadu Telugu Daily News Paper as well as in the website as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to include the petitioner in the selection process for appointment to the post of Paricharika at the 3rd respondent temple pursuant to the advertisement issued by the 3rd respondent published on 14.04.2016 in Eenadu Telugu Daily News Paper as well as in the website and to pass...” 2. Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein has expired and the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. Therefore, he requested this Court to close the present Writ Petition. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 20.06.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.18721 of 2016 20.06.2025 ASR