Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155665 (ALL)

GAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/981/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45358 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 981 of 2025 Applicant :- Gajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Pandey,Arpit Gupta,Jagriti Bardhan Rao,Jyotika Yog Sharma,Prakash Giri Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Shri Vivek Pandey, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.248 of 2024, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 of B.N.S. & Sections 13(1), 13(5) of Public Examination Act registered at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application and as both the named co-accused person have already been granted bail, he will also appear before the trial court and seek an application for bail. 4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. In case the applicant appears before the trial court and moves an application for bail, his bail application shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law keeping in view of the propositions of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench