SALMAN KHAN @ SHALLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND ANOTHER
/6338/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45566 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6338 of 2025 Applicant :- Salman Khan @ Shallu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Trinetra Shankar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. At the very outset learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet number has wrongly been mentioned as Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2018 in place of Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2020. He submits that he may be permitted to correct the same during course of the day.
2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
3. In view of the above, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is allowed and the he is directed to correct the same during course of the day.
4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
5. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer for quashing of the charge sheet no. 1 of 2020 dated 16.5.2020 submitted in case crime no. 871 of 2018 under Sections 498-A, 323, I.P.C. Police Station- Ghazipur,District- Lucknow and also quash the summoning order dated 5.1.2021 as well as N.B.W. dated 27.3.2023 in criminal case no. W/S 869 of 2021 (State Vs. Salman Khan @ Shallu and another) passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate Custom Lucknow and pending in the same court so far as it related to the applicant as contained in Annexure Nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively to the petition.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.
7. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to
file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's
judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.
8. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by
learned counsel for the applicant.
9. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
10. The application is disposed off accordingly.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench