( 2025:JHHC:16586 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4999 of 2025 ------ Moktar Shekh @ Mokhtar Hussain @ Moktar Sk @ Moktar Hussain aged about 34 years son of Rohim Shekh @ Rahim @ Rohim Sk, resident of villae Rahaspur, Post Office & Police Station Pakur (M) & District Pakur, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate : Mr. Satyanshu Shubham, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 23-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.246 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 117, 109, 332(C), 303(2), 76, 324(5), 352 & 351 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons being armed with lathi, danda and iron rod entered into the house of the informant, abused and assaulted the informant, his son and daughter-in-law, outraged the modesty of the informant’s daughter-in-law, looted cash of Rs.2,80,000/- and ornaments kept in an almirah and also vandalized the house of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-10 of this bail application It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 12.06.2025, in B.A. No. 4057 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.04.2025 as is evident from para-01 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur, in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.246 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/