SIYARAM MALI SON OF SHRI MROPAL MALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/6548/2025 · 2025-07-16
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15564 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15564 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6548/2025 Siyaram Mali Son of Shri Morpal Mali, Aged About 52 Years, Resi- dent Of C-105, Land Mark City, Kunhadi, Kota (Raj.) Presently Working As Principal , Government Sr. Secondary School Satheli, Block Taleda, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Gov- ernment Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Joint Secretary, Department Of Education, Govern- ment Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gauttam For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 16/07/2025 Although, this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to extend the petitioner benefit of promotion; but,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if he is permitted to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) with a direction to them to decide it expeditiously in accordance with law taking into
consideration an order dated 31.03.2022 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Sandeep Kumar Berar versus
[2025:RJ-JP:26474] (2 of 2) [CW-6548/2025] State of Rajasthan & Anr.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.18074/2018. In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:-
1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today.
2. The respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon in accordance with law taking into consideration the order dated 31.03.2022 passed in the case of Sandeep Kumar Berar (supra) within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt
of
the
representation with communication of the decision to the petitioner. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/61