Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15563 (RAJ)

PVR INOX LIMITED v. ARCHAIC DEVELOPERS LLP

ARBAP/56/2024 · 2025-08-01

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Arbitration Application No. 56/2024 Pvr Inox Limited, (Earlier Known As Pvr Limited) Having Its Registered Office At 7Th Floor, Lotus Grandeur Building, Veera Desai Road, Opposite Gundecha Symphony, Andheri (West) Mumbai-400053 And Its Corporate Office At Block A, 4Th Floor, Building No. 9, Dlf Cyber City, Phase-Iii, Gurgaon-122002 (Haryana) Through Authorised Officer Mr. Karan Chauhan. ----Applicant Versus Archaic Developers Llp, 101/28, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302020 Through Mr. Charan Khangarot. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Ms. Alisha Chopra for Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 01/08/2025 1. This application is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for sort ‘the Act’) for appointment of a sole arbitrator. The parties to the lis entered into a contract for supply of material, the clause therein provided dispute resolution through arbitration. 2. The arbitration clause is reproduced below:- “In case of any dispute between the Parties the same shall be settled by arbitration conducted in English, at Jaipur, by a sole arbitrator to be appointed by the parties mutually, under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and/or any amendments thereof.” (2 of 2) [ARBAP-56/2024] 3. The applicant served a notice dated 21.12.2023 for appointing the arbitrator. On failure to do the needful, the present arbitration application is filed. 4. The application is allowed and prayer for appointment of arbitrator is accepted. 5. Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.) Resident of C-601, Mewar Apartment Haldi Ghati Apartment Pratap Nagar, Jaipur-302033 is appointed as sole arbitrator with the consent of counsel for the parties. 6. The arbitrator shall be paid fee in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act, as amended. The fee of the arbitrator will be equally borne by both the parties. 7. The arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as per time limit specified under Section 29A of the Act. 8. It is clarified that the reference shall be subject to the applicant’s complying with all the requirements of the agreement including the condition of pre-deposit. 9. Since the main case has been disposed of, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 10. Copy of this order be sent to the appointed arbitrator. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/82