Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15560 (UTT)

Lt Col Retd T S Payal v. State of Uttarakhand

WPMS/3164/2025 · 2025-11-20

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Wpss noSL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No. 3164 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for the respondent-MDDA. 4. This writ petition was dismissed vide order dated 20.11.2025 on the statement made by learned counsel for MDDA that the representation made by petitioner was rejected in terms of direction issued in WPPIL No. 133 of 2021. 5. Learned counsel for the review applicant submits that the statement made by learned counsel for the MDDA is not correct. Petitioner’s representation is yet to be considered by respondent no. 2. 6. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for the MDDA concedes that his statement was not properly understood. 7. Having regard to the facts of the case, the order dated 20.11.2025 is reviewed/recalled. 8. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel appearing for MDDA assures that Chairman, MDDA / Commissioner, Garhwal Division shall take decision on petitioner’s representation, as per law, within six weeks. 9. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the MDDA, on record. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 19.12.2025 Aswal