Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15560 (JHR)

RAJU PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2990/2025 · 2025-06-03

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14337 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2990 of 2025 Raju Prasad aged 35 years, S/o Gobind Prasad, R/o Narayanpur, P.O. & P.S.-Hasan Bazar, District-Seraikella Kharsawan, Jharkhand .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate Ms. Anjali Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, Advocate ------ Order No. 02 / Dated : 03.06.2025. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 16/2025 for the offences registered under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 314, 351(2), 323, 109, 126(2) 115(2), 117(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no specific and omnibus allegation is made against the petitioner and there is no criminal antecedent against him, as such he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and the learned court below on his surrender shall release him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 16/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. It is made clear that if the petitioner will not cooperate in investigation/trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Pawan/Sangam/ -