Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15559 (GAU)

MITHUN BAIDYAKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

I.A.(Crl.)/918/2023 · 2025-04-01

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010148532023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRL.A(J)/108/2023 MITHUN BAIDYAKAR S/O-LT. UDDHAB BAIDYAKAR, R/O-VILL-THEKASU, P.S.-DUDHNOI, DIST.- GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM 2:SRI GOBINDA BAIDYAKAR S/O-LT. GOPAL BAIDYAKAR R/O-VILL-THEKASU PART-2 DUDHNOI WEEKLY MARKET P.O.-DUDHNOI P.S.-DUDHNOI DIST.-GOALPARA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HALDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 02.04.2025 Heard Mr. B Haldar, the learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for the appellant. Also Page No.# 2/2 heard Mr. Bankim Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. The appeal is admitted for hearing. Issue notice to the respondent No. 2. No formal notice is required to be sent to the respondent No. 1 as because Mr. Sarma has accepted notice. However, extra copies of the Memo of Appeal shall be provided to him during the course of day. The appellant shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondent No. 2 by registered post with A/D. Call for the LCR. List after 4 (four) weeks. JUDGE Comparing Assistant