HAUSHILA PRASAD SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/853/2025 · 2025-08-04
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45184 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 853 of 2025 Applicant :- Haushila Prasad Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Alok Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A- l for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 783 of 2008, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C., Police Station Kadipur, District Sultanpur.
3. The aforesaid case was registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 30.06.2008.
4. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant stated that he does not want to press the instant application on merits and he confined his submission for issuance of a direction to the trial court for consideration of his bail application.
5. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of by observing that in case the applicant appears before the trial court and seeks his release on bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, keeping in view the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., (2022) 10 SCC 51. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench