Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15556 (HP)

RAM SAWROOP v. HRTC AND ANOTHER

CWP/6488/2024 · 2025-04-04

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP 6488 of 2024 Decided on: 4th April, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Ram Sawroop ....Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Even though the respondents have not filed reply to the writ petition, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage. 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: - “i. That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment i.e. w.e.f 22-08-2005, with all consequential benefits, alongwith up to date interest. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - ii. That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner immediately after one year i.e. in 2005, by modifying regularization order dated 31.03.2015 with all consequential benefits.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner are covered by the decision rendered in Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. 2 CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 09.11.2023. - 3 - The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge April 4, 2025 R.Atal