Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45922 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7391 of 2025 Petitioner :- Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority Thru.Authorized Sudeep Vidhyarth Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Infrastructure Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sachin Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard Sri Sachin Upadhyay, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Apoorva Tewari along with Sri Siddharth Nandwani and Prashant Shukla, who have filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2. 2. The Vakalatnana and the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner are taken on record. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 13.05.2024 passed by the revisional authority in exercise of powers under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 read with Section 12 of the U.P. Industrial Development Act., 1976. 4. While challenging the said order, the counsel for the petitioner states that almost in similar circumstances, different orders were passed in respect of two different persons, who are similarly situated as per him. 5. While addressing the issue on merits, all the parties, who are present here agreed that the matter may be remanded to the revisional authority to decide the matter afresh, as the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 16.12.2024 passed in Writ Petition being Matters Under Article 227 No.5869 of 2024 (U.G. Infrastructure Private Ltd. Delhi Thru. Director Sri Arvind Singh Rathore v. State of U.P. & Ors.). 6. In view thereof, present petition stands allowed on the same reasoning as contained in the order dated 16.12.2024. The impugned order dated 13.05.2024 is set aside. 7. In view of the agreement in between the parties, the matter is remanded to the revisional authority to consider and pass orders afresh in accordance with law with all expedition preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. 8. The petitioner would be at liberty to place any orders of which, the petitioner seeks precedential value. In case, the petitioner places any orders, the revisional authority shall consider the arguments of the petitioner as well as the precedents cited by him, if any. 9. The revisional authority would not be bound by any observations made in the present order and would be entitled to consider all the pleas that may be raised by both the parties. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench