VINAY SAGAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
/6992/2025 · 2025-08-06
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45747-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6992 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinay Sagar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0287 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha, 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Pisawan, District- Sitapur.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273, and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51.
6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be
disposed of in view of the above said facts.
7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the law as laid down by Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
8. However, It is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 14.08.2025 at 11.00 a.m. sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. [Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.]
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench