Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15551 (AP)

K.Upendra, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/3768/2022 · 2025-02-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010198432022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3768/2022 Between: 1. K.UPENDRA,, S/O.K.SHANMUGAM, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC- MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, KANNUR, DEVARAHARIL, BANGLORE. R/O.17-333T, NAIDU STREET, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. K.VIJAYA KUMARI,, W/O. K.SHANMUGAM, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC- GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O.17-333T, NAIDU STREET, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. K.SHANMUGAM,, S/O.K. UP ENDER, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC- RETD. TAHASILDAR, R/O.17-333T, NAIDU STREET, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. K.SUPRIYA,, W/O. VISHNUVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, RLO.TIRUCHANUR, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. K.BHARGAVI,, S/O. KARTHIK GUNASEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O.17-333T, NAIDU STREET, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. K PARAMESWARI, W/O. K.UPENDRA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO.18-1-66/C1, FIRST FLOOR, YASHODA NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioners / Respondent Nos.1 to 5, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in D.V.C.No.48 of 2019 on the file of the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.S.Parineeta, leaned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the matter may be disposed of, dispensing with the presence of the Petitioners, before the trial Court. 3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the criminal petition is disposed of, dispensing with the presence of the Petitioners/ Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in D.V.C.No.48 of 2019 before the trial Court, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.02.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.3768 of 2022 Dt.28.02.2025 Dinesh