Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155503 (ALL)

ABHISHEK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/6982/2025 · 2025-08-04

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45166-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6982 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard Sri Janendra Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G. D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents and perused the material placed on record. 2. In view of the proposed order being passed, notice to respondents No. 4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. No. 83 of 2025 dated 14.06.2025 Under Sections- 110, 115(2), 352 BNS, Police Station Vikas Nagar, District- Lucknow contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition." (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of F.I.R. No. 83 of 2025 dated 14.06.2025 Under Sections- 110, 115(2), 352 BNS, Police Station Vikas Nagar, District- Lucknow and also not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned first information report. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 5. Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent- State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offences allegedly committed by the petitioners, entail sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273, and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, It is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 11.08.2025 at 11.00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, the protection of this order would not be available to them. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 (Manoj K.) (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench