Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155499 (ALL)

HARSH KUMAR @ HARSH GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, FAIZABAD AND OTHERS

/4645/2025 · 2025-08-06

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45812 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4645 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administrative) Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to decide the Revision No.434/2014, under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, Salikramors vs. Taz Mohammad and others, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1- Additional Commissioner (Administrative), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1/ Additional Commissioner (Administrative) Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya is directed to decide the Revision No.434/2014, under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, Salikramors vs. Taz Mohammad and others, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 6.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench