Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155483 (ALL)

SHAHEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7024/2025 · 2025-08-20

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48805-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7024 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shaheen Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Yadav,Anoop Vajpayee Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. Heard. This Court has passed order dated 06.08.2025, which reads as under: "1. Heard Sri Atul Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: "(1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the o.p. no. 2 and 3 to take the appropriate legal action against the opposite party no. 4 to 7 in respect of the offence committed by them upon the petitioner and her minor daughters, son and husband, in the interest of justice. (2) Issue a issuance a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the opposite party no 2 and 3 to protect the life liberty and property of petitioner from illegal act, conduct and behavior of the opposite party no. 4 to 7 and provide the proper security to the petitioner and her family, in the interest of justice. (3) Issue a issuance a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the opposite party no.2 to take the decision on the application dated 11-07-2025 in light of the judgment of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of U.P. and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1, passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India." 3. Attention has been drawn towards the Annexure No. 2, which is an application of the present petitioner to the Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow ventilating her grievance and plight seeking justice, but as per the learned counsel for the petitioner despite the fact that she is running from pillar to post, no FIR has been lodged and no investigation has been conducted. 4. Since the allegations are serious, therefore, on the next date, the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Station House Officer, Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow shall appear in person and shall file his personal short counter affidavit apprising the Court about the exercise being undertaken by him on the application of the petitioner. 5. List the matter on 20.08.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. shall intimate this order to the opposite party no. 3- SHO, P.S. Kakori, District Lucknow telephonically/on Whats-app/on e- mode or any other convenient mode for its compliance." In compliance of the aforesaid order, Sri Satish Chandra, S.H.O. P.S. Kakori, District Lucknow, is present in person. He has filed short personal affidavit, which is taken on record. The S.H.O. has informed that the F.I.R. has been lodged and copy of the F.I.R has been enclosed with the short personal affidavit. The S.H.O. has also assured that on the allegations in question proper investigation would be conducted and proper Police report will be filed following the procedure, so prescribed. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition, therefore, this petition is consigned to the records, however, it is expected from the S.H.O./I.O. concerned to conduct and conclude the investigation strictly in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Order Date :- 20.8.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench