Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 58 of 2017 Vinod Kumar Chandrakar S/o Khilawan Singh Chandrakar Aged About 40 Years R/o Gorkapar, Police Station Anda, Tahsil- Gunderdehi, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.,
... Appellant/Complainant versus 1 - Kamlesh Verma S/o Lakhanlal Verma, Aged About 44 Years R/o Kurampuri, Infront Of Dabha, Police Station, Tahsil And District Nuapahaha, Orissa., (Accused) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through District Magistrate, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Appellant : None, despite repeated calls. For Respondent 1 : None, though served. For Respondent 2/State : Dr. Surendra Kumar Dewangan, Panel Lawyer.
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 25/09/2025
1. Today when the matter is called repeatedly, no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant. Even on 10.07.2025 and 13.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called.
2. In the above circumstance and in absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, no other option is left out to this Court but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE Anjani